Thread:Corbierr/@comment-25576856-20150221010401/@comment-25576856-20150221021948

The Mick thing, I do agree with. They didn't do him justice there, and they were trying to justify Jara.

The important characters in the finale overall were Nina, Fabian, Eddie, Jerome, Joy, Victor, Rufus, and Senkhara. Not just Nina, Fabian, Joy, and Eddie. In the climax scene in the library, the important characters were Nina, Eddie, Joy (for saving Fabian), Victor, Rufus, and Senkhara. That's a lot of characters in comparison to Nina and Fabian.

The season 1 finale did not focus at all on Joytricia. It showed them being happy and reunited for a couple of seconds, then switched back to Nina and her Chosen One/Fabian stuff. The other characters didn't get enough justice in the finale. In season 2, it focused on all of them. I don't think the season 2 finale went by too fast; each character didn't need that long to show that their storyline was wrapped up. That's all each of them needed, and I like how all of the plotlines got justice.

Yeah, a season finale SHOULD be plot-oriented. This was the episode that someone had to get to the mask, and the plot had to be wrapped up. That doesn't mean it didn't care about the characters. The only character that didn't get justice was Mick; everyone else did. I loved the part when Victor gave Joy his tear of gold; it showed that he isn't really that bad/evil after all. (I should do a blog about Victor.) Rather than having Nina being the good guy and Victor and Rufus being the bad guys, it showed a different side to Victor. Not to mention that the season 2 finale had the epic tears of gold cliffhanger.

Why do you think Fabian would have been a better Osirian?